Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Dec 2012 22:03 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545111
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by Zaitch
by Bounty on Fri 14th Dec 2012 19:21
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Zaitch"
In general I think filtering hardcore porn from the search results is an okay idea and it's not necessarily healthy for children to be exposed to such, but I don't agree with the method Google went for here; Safe Search is the correct place to put this in as that is user-controllable and can be disabled -- filtering of content without giving a consenting adult a way of disabling that filtering I cannot agree with.
How about instead of thinking of it as censorship, think of it as trying to give correct results. As an adult I don't search with "Safe Search" on, however if I want to search for "gay" for whatever reason..... doesn't necessarily mean (imply) I want to see a bunch of guys slamming each other in the ass. The difference between "gay wedding" and "gay wedding porn" is signifigant.




Member since:
2006-02-15
In general I think filtering hardcore porn from the search results is an okay idea and it's not necessarily healthy for children to be exposed to such, but I don't agree with the method Google went for here; Safe Search is the correct place to put this in as that is user-controllable and can be disabled -- filtering of content without giving a consenting adult a way of disabling that filtering I cannot agree with. A user called "johjeff" here wrote a sentence that quite well summarizes why:
That is, a group of people deem what should be acceptable and opposing opinions will be filtered from the view of the larger audience. While what Google is doing here is still pretty benign, such filtering is still a very slippery slope and slipping even once will send you on a fast path to doom.