To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
They did it originally for survival when NeXTSTEP team came on board.
The original Apple was all about Apple's own protocols and formats.
Nowadays they are going again to their old self, like any big corporation.
Just look at the amount of vendor extensions any given standard has.
The original Apple was all about Apple's own protocols and formats.
Nowadays they are going again to their old self, like any big corporation.
Just look at the amount of vendor extensions any given standard has.
Good point. I'd completely forgotten about Apple Talk et al
Corporations use standards to out source work. They don't really care much for them. If there was a pre-packaged proprietary solution, they'd be just as keen on it.
That's the hilarious irony when the open source community holds companies like Google, and formerly even Sun to some sort of higher ethical standard, as if they're not just profit motivated corporations.
Apple isn't much better. They also don't like open standards, and use them only when they have no control over the situation. Look at their opposition to open video codecs and you'll see it clearly.
But not every corporation is so low on business ethics, as to use crooked standards for lock in. Many are decent and favor interoperability and open standards.
Aiming for profit and being ethical are not contradicting interests. Contrary to what MS or Apple try to convince everyone around.
Edited 2012-12-15 22:44 UTC





Member since:
2007-03-26
How does this differ from any other commercial vendor? "
MS are easily the worst for it. Even Apple are more keen on embracing open standards than Microsoft are (CUPS, ODF, HTML5 (webkit far surpasses Trident), etc).
Edited 2012-12-15 10:49 UTC