Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Dec 2012 22:03 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545332
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-13
No, it's not. It's not like that at all.
Yes, it is exactly like that:
Sexual images that include violence will be hidden and sexual images that include fast cars will be hidden. And the filters are targeting neither the violence nor the fast cars.
Statistically speaking, the chance that you have an IQ as high as mine is less than 1 in 200 -- even ignoring the fact that I had to explain something so simple and obvious as the analogy that I made.
Edited 2012-12-15 23:10 UTC