Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 15th Dec 2012 19:11 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545376
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
And that's exactly what I am arguing for, don't you understand? I would want children to learn that even if the government doesn't care the people themselves do instead of that the government cared about one, famous one and the rest were then forgotten.
But this isn't the government coming out with this plan apropos of nothing. It is the people pressuring the government, a government which had knocked back the plan before.
We need to get this fact straight.
The fact is that giving Turing a pardon would steal the thunder away from the rest
No, that is not a fact. Not a fact at all.
and given how short a public memory is people wouldn't anymore have the motivation for them; "you already got your pardon!"
And the same would happen if it happened your way:
"Well, they couldn't even give Turing a pardon. What's the point in doing anything further?"
We can all come up with fantasy scenarios and they prove exactly nothing.
Any message that the government says is simply too easy to forget or ignore, you need peers to make a long-lasting impression. Appeal to people themselves and you'll get a better result than you could ever get with a formal apology from a faceless government.
I don't buy into this "everything the government does is always bad" argument. I have no time for libertarian scaremongering.
I don't buy into this "everything the government does is always bad" argument. I have no time for libertarian scaremongering.
This clearly says you're not seeing my argument at all. I never said or even implied anything like that, but if that's what you're seeing then there's no point in continuing any longer.





Member since:
2006-02-15
I would like for those children and teenagers to go to history class and learn about how society fought for the rights of a gay person even though he's dead, and how being gay is not a barrier to being loved and acts of heroism.
What I would not like for those children to learn in history is that only a few people in society tried to do anything, even if it was just symbolic. That society couldn't even be bothered to pressure their own government into making a symbolic gesture.
And that's exactly what I am arguing for, don't you understand? I would want children to learn that even if the government doesn't care the people themselves do instead of that the government cared about one, famous one and the rest were then forgotten. The fact is that giving Turing a pardon would steal the thunder away from the rest and given how short a public memory is people wouldn't anymore have the motivation for them; "you already got your pardon!"
Any message that the government says is simply too easy to forget or ignore, you need peers to make a long-lasting impression. Appeal to people themselves and you'll get a better result than you could ever get with a formal apology from a faceless government.