Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 17th Dec 2012 11:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545522
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Simple. Google is not on WP, because it sucks ..
by MOS6510 on Mon 17th Dec 2012 13:49
in reply to "RE[2]: Simple. Google is not on WP, because it sucks .. "
RE[4]: Simple. Google is not on WP, because it sucks ..
by rikkirakk on Thu 20th Dec 2012 22:35
in reply to "RE[3]: Simple. Google is not on WP, because it sucks .. "
RE[3]: Simple. Google is not on WP, because it sucks ..
by JAlexoid on Mon 17th Dec 2012 13:50
in reply to "RE[2]: Simple. Google is not on WP, because it sucks .. "
RE[3]: Simple. Google is not on WP, because it sucks ..
by zima on Mon 24th Dec 2012 22:59
in reply to "RE[2]: Simple. Google is not on WP, because it sucks .. "
Oh, how I sometimes wish I could just have a database-like search engine that does not try to second-guess my searches.
We kinda had that, with directories (like dmoz.org); it wasn't that good.
PS. Maybe now Wikipedia can be partly seen as providing such database-like search, with its hierarchically organised, into categories, articles.





Member since:
2006-02-15
Out of the two I find Google giving me better matches for my searches, sometimes Bing doesn't return anything relevant whatsoever. That said, ever since Google started second-guessing what I actually want I've noticed the relevance to my searches going down there, too.
Oh, how I sometimes wish I could just have a database-like search engine that does not try to second-guess my searches.