Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Dec 2012 14:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545656
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Automatically waiving samsung's rights because they were supposed to have discovered Hogan's relationship during voir dire, even though he explicitly lied to the questions...please! That should be grounds for disbarring this judge.
I wasn't aware he had lied, can you post the questions and answered that contain the lie and the source for the information. Thanks
Tony Swash,
"I wasn't aware he had lied, can you post the questions and answered that contain the lie and the source for the information. Thanks"
You can read all that in the court transcripts linked in the article. Basically, samsung should have discovered the facts before a verdict was reached. If it weren't for Hogan's big mouth after the trial, we may never have learned about his bias, so in a sense we're "lucky" that the truth came out, even if the court refuses to grant a fair trial based on it.
Edited 2012-12-18 17:02 UTC





Member since:
2011-01-28
Automatically waiving samsung's rights because they were supposed to have discovered Hogan's relationship during voir dire, even though he explicitly lied to the questions...please! That should be grounds for disbarring this judge.
Even someone who favors apple's pro-patent position should recognise that justice cannot be served when it allows jurors to knowingly serve under false pretences.