Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Dec 2012 14:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545662
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by jared_wilkes
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 18th Dec 2012 15:33
in reply to "Comment by jared_wilkes"
RE[2]: Comment by jared_wilkes
by jared_wilkes on Tue 18th Dec 2012 15:39
in reply to "RE: Comment by jared_wilkes"





Member since:
2011-04-25
"The real reason, of course, is that Samsung's European cases against Apple weren't going all too well anyway - worse even than Apple's European cases against Samsung - so there's nothing to be gained from continuing them."
Huh... across many posts for many months, you've stated innumerable times that Apple was losing everywhere but in the U.S. Now it turns out that by "losing" you meant not losing as much as Samsung. Odd.
The real reason isn't the strength of their case. It's the threat of an EU antitrust decision. Otherwise, Samsung would be dropping injunction requests in other venues, particularly the US, besides Europe.