To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Thom_Holwerda,
"It's a baseline. If you treat the web as I described, you'll never run into trouble."
What do you mean? It sounds like your rule is saying we shouldn't expect to keep the rights to anything we put on the web. But isn't osnews itself contradicting that rule?
Do you not expect people to obey the footer at the bottom of each page?
What do you mean? It sounds like your rule is saying we shouldn't expect to keep the rights to anything we put on the web. But isn't osnews itself contradicting that rule?
Do you not expect people to obey the footer at the bottom of each page?
He's talking about a practical and pragmatic mental attitude, not a legal position. Its still worth trying to defend, or at least state, your copyrights, so long as it being breached in a manner you can't do anything about doesn't upset you.
I do disagree slightly with Thom though. I think its worth people at least being made aware of the lack-of-privacy terms you get with services. Ownership of ones own space on the web or (more futilely perhaps) lobbying for genuine ownership through new services is worth promoting. Royal Mail doesn't claim to own the contents of my post, so its not an inevitable thing. They can just get away with it at the moment as no one reads the damned T&Cs.
I would like to see a legal requirement for a abbreviated terms-and-conditions for services and software. Something less than 500 words.
Sorry, copyright is copyright.
If you give away the copy right via T&Cs then you should have read them, however if an image is yours and exists on your website it is still yours and it should be respected.
Just because you can doesn't mean you should.
I am sorry Thom, sometimes you come off as someone who would rather live in shit than pick up a shovel.
Edited 2012-12-18 19:56 UTC





Member since:
2005-06-29
It's a baseline. If you treat the web as I described, you'll never run into trouble.