Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Dec 2012 14:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545687
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Jury qualifications?
by Alfman on Tue 18th Dec 2012 18:56
in reply to "RE[2]: Jury qualifications?"
jared_wilkes,
"The Court disagrees that Hogan disobeyed the Court's instructions."
No, the judge simply dismissed activities that happened in deliberations under "Rule 606(b)". The incorrect legal methodologies applied were revealed to the press by Hogan and other juror members.
RE[4]: Jury qualifications?
by jared_wilkes on Tue 18th Dec 2012 19:18
in reply to "RE[3]: Jury qualifications?"
No, that is not all. Yes, Koh, correctly states that post-jury comments about deliberations are inadmissible, but she also never identifies a single action that occurred in deliberation to show that Hogan violated any jury instruction -- as she was very careful to go through each argument put forward by Samsung whether or not the alleged evidence put forth by Samsung was admissible or not.
RE[4]: Jury qualifications?
by Nelson on Tue 18th Dec 2012 19:36
in reply to "RE[3]: Jury qualifications?"





Member since:
2011-04-25
The Court disagrees that Hogan disobeyed the Court's instructions.