Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Dec 2012 17:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545727
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Alfman
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 18th Dec 2012 19:57
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Alfman"
RE[4]: Comment by Alfman
by lucas_maximus on Tue 18th Dec 2012 20:00
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Alfman"
No it isn't. However this is what I have issue with:
It's a baseline. If you treat the web as I described, you'll never run into trouble.
...
There's a very simple rule on the internet that everyone ought to be aware of: the moment you put something on the web, it's no longer your property.
...
There's a very simple rule on the internet that everyone ought to be aware of: the moment you put something on the web, it's no longer your property.
And that is what I commented about. I thought that would have been obvious.
Edited 2012-12-18 20:02 UTC
RE[4]: Comment by Alfman
by Soulbender on Wed 19th Dec 2012 02:11
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Alfman"
RE[3]: Comment by Alfman
by Luminair on Wed 19th Dec 2012 05:55
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Alfman"





Member since:
2009-08-18
Sorry, copyright is copyright.
If you give away the copy right via T&Cs then you should have read them, however if an image is yours and exists on your website it is still yours and it should be respected.
Just because you can doesn't mean you should.
I am sorry Thom, sometimes you come off as someone who would rather live in shit than pick up a shovel.
Edited 2012-12-18 19:56 UTC