Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Dec 2012 14:31 UTC
Legal Lots of news about Apple vs. Samsung (and vice versa) in both the US and Europe today. In the US, judge Koh dealth two blows: one to Samsung (no retrial based on juror misconduct), the other to Apple (no permanent sales ban). In Europe, in the meantime, Samsung announced it will cease all lawsuits injunction requests against Apple... But only in Europe.
Thread beginning with comment 545770
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[9]: Jury qualifications?
by Alfman on Tue 18th Dec 2012 21:40 UTC in reply to "RE[8]: Jury qualifications?"
Alfman
Member since:
2011-01-28

jared_wilkes,

The court dismissing Hogan's statements as inadmissible is not the same thing as the court claiming he did not disobey instructions. I suspect you probably misspoke, so do you mind if we just drop it? If not, will you just agree to disagree with me instead of us arguing in circles?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[10]: Jury qualifications?
by jared_wilkes on Tue 18th Dec 2012 21:49 in reply to "RE[9]: Jury qualifications?"
jared_wilkes Member since:
2011-04-25

jared_wilkes,

The court dismissing Hogan's statements as inadmissible is not the same thing as the court claiming he did not disobey instructions.


Correct. I'm not claiming it is however. I am claiming that Koh specifically addresses each of Samsung's potential arguments regardless of whether or not she can consider Hogan's statements.

I suspect you probably misspoke,


No, I did not mispeak.

...so do you mind if we just drop it?


I don't mind if you drop it. I do mind if you presume what I think and continue to spout mistruths. If you choose to continue, I will choose to continue to contradict you.

If not, will you just agree to disagree with me instead of us arguing in circles?


You've said this already -- it's you going in circles. Go ahead and stop doing so if you'd like.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[11]: Jury qualifications?
by Alfman on Tue 18th Dec 2012 22:20 in reply to "RE[10]: Jury qualifications?"
Alfman Member since:
2011-01-28

jared_wilkes,

"Correct. I'm not claiming it is however. I am claiming that Koh specifically addresses each of Samsung's potential arguments regardless of whether or not she can consider Hogan's statements."

Great, I'm truly glad we can finally agree.

Reply Parent Score: 2