Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Dec 2012 14:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545780
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[12]: Jury qualifications?
by jared_wilkes on Wed 19th Dec 2012 02:05
in reply to "RE[11]: Jury qualifications?"
RE[13]: Jury qualifications?
by Alfman on Wed 19th Dec 2012 05:07
in reply to "RE[12]: Jury qualifications?"
jared_wilkes,
"Your self-deluding if you think I just agreed with you."
Did you consider it offensive that we might agree on something? Because if my point was correct, and I don't disagree with your clarifications, then that's a sign of agreement.
I suppose this explains why you rejected my offers to agree to disagree. So my final words in this thread are thus: Let's disagree to agree 





Member since:
2011-01-28
jared_wilkes,
"Correct. I'm not claiming it is however. I am claiming that Koh specifically addresses each of Samsung's potential arguments regardless of whether or not she can consider Hogan's statements."
Great, I'm truly glad we can finally agree.