Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Dec 2012 14:31 UTC
Legal Lots of news about Apple vs. Samsung (and vice versa) in both the US and Europe today. In the US, judge Koh dealth two blows: one to Samsung (no retrial based on juror misconduct), the other to Apple (no permanent sales ban). In Europe, in the meantime, Samsung announced it will cease all lawsuits injunction requests against Apple... But only in Europe.
Thread beginning with comment 545826
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[13]: Jury qualifications?
by Alfman on Wed 19th Dec 2012 05:07 UTC in reply to "RE[12]: Jury qualifications?"
Alfman
Member since:
2011-01-28

jared_wilkes,

"Your self-deluding if you think I just agreed with you."

Did you consider it offensive that we might agree on something? Because if my point was correct, and I don't disagree with your clarifications, then that's a sign of agreement.

I suppose this explains why you rejected my offers to agree to disagree. So my final words in this thread are thus: Let's disagree to agree ;)

Reply Parent Score: 2

jared_wilkes Member since:
2011-04-25

Maybe you are just not smart.

You are claiming that the Judge did not address the arguments based on the post-trial comments because it was inadmissible.

I'm claiming that she found the evidence inadmissible but still explained why the arguments didn't carry.

If you think we are in any form of agreement, you are not smart.

Go back to my early post with the quotes from the ruling. Four of the five quotes address how Samsung's argument (all four of the five are based on post-trial comments) fail -- despite the post-trial comments being inadmissible.

Edited 2012-12-19 05:48 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2