Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Dec 2012 23:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545980
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
renox,
Floating point used to be far more accurate than ints when cpu registers were limited to 32bit. Now that we have 64bit registers and SSE's FP mantissa is only 52bits, fixed point integers can give us more accuracy as well.
I wonder if there are any game worlds that are big enough such that this makes an observable difference?
If each object were tracked to millimetre resolution, then SSE's 64bit FP is accurate up to half a light year in any direction. 64bit signed fixed point would cover 970 light years in any direction.
So I guess there's probably not a very compelling reason to switch unless your simulating a large universe.
Nice chart showing breakdown of FP formats.
http://www.monash.edu.au/policy/gpnumacc.htm