Linked by lucas_maximus on Fri 21st Dec 2012 00:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 546114
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Comment by Drumhellar
by Drumhellar on Fri 21st Dec 2012 20:01
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by Drumhellar"




Member since:
2005-11-29
its a little more than this in my opinion:
Apple's extensions to provide touch interactions within HTML5 is troublesome, especially in light of the fact that they refuse to work with the W3C to standardize what they have (because it involves royalty free use, presumably) and they refuse to get behind Microsoft's Touch efforts.
The amount of the mobile web that uses proprietary prefixed touch extensions is scary. It isn't a mobile web, it's a WebKit web, and other vendors namely Mozilla, Opera, and Microsoft are left out in the cold.
It is very convenient for Apple to lock-in the mobile web using their touch model, (and more, a lot of the mobile web also uses prefixed CSS transitions and text scaling properties specific to WebKit)
Google by virtue of using WebKit gets these things for free, but other vendors don't. That's what is fundamentally broken about Apple's approach.
If you think being a Web Dev is hard, try doing Mobile Web development. A complete nightmare.