Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 22nd Dec 2012 16:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 546169
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: But is it more than eyecandy?
by Kaj-de-Vos on Sat 22nd Dec 2012 17:42
in reply to "RE: But is it more than eyecandy?"
RE[2]: But is it more than eyecandy?
by vtorri on Sat 22nd Dec 2012 19:32
in reply to "RE: But is it more than eyecandy?"
If I recall correctly, E17 got a bit more PR when it came with gOS (Ubuntu based, I think), a distro with lots of Google & Web2.0 services built into it. Had a sort of OSX-on-a-budget look about it. Dead project now.
Take a look at Bodhi Linux or Elive. They are based on E17 too.
RE[3]: But is it more than eyecandy?
by lucas_maximus on Sat 22nd Dec 2012 20:14
in reply to "RE[2]: But is it more than eyecandy?"





Member since:
2008-06-03
I could be wrong, but I think E17's "pitch" when it first came out was that it could (supposedly) do most of the things other desktop environments could with less resources. It included it's own file manager, some effects/compositing, had some sort of desktop grid feature or "shelves" or something, and could also support external modules.
But yeah, it always seemed a more "bling" based environment to me as well. Couldn't really gel with it myself, but I tend to prefer tiling or box type WMs, so I won't say my opinion of it is fair in any sense. Always good to have choice, though.
If I recall correctly, E17 got a bit more PR when it came with gOS (Ubuntu based, I think), a distro with lots of Google & Web2.0 services built into it. Had a sort of OSX-on-a-budget look about it. Dead project now.