Linked by Kaj-de-Vos on Thu 20th Dec 2012 00:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 546176
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Why the emphasis on Syllable?
by Kaj-de-Vos on Sat 22nd Dec 2012 19:24
in reply to "RE[2]: Why the emphasis on Syllable?"
Actually, that's pretty much what I did on our own site:
http://web.syllable.org/news/2012-12-19-01-42-Open-sourced-REBOL-3-...
http://web.syllable.org/news/2012-11-18-20-47-Red-high-level-progra...
I wrote an extended version of the first Red article for OSNews that happened to fall in the first day or so of Thom's vacation. When he returned, the article was dropped for reasons unknown to me. Then the next Red release happened almost together with the REBOL release, so I was forced to combine the two news items.




Member since:
2012-12-22
Nor did I say, or imply that you did. Merely that your lead:
wasn't your (meaning Syllable's) news, you buried the lead.
A better headline might have been have been:
Though personally I think that is way too many stories to put in one piece. Again personally, I think that it would have been better to have one story announcing the open sourcing of REBOL 3 — aside from the article back in Sep saying that REBOL 3 would be open sourced there has been a story here about the actual release of the source — and then a separate Syllable related one.
Nor (once again) personally do I think the prediction bit was relevant to the story.
It is fine if you disagree (you wrote the story you wanted to write), I am just pointing out that I think it would have been better expressed by giving REBOL the credit for the open sourcing before you emphasize the the Syllable part.