To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
1) It's basically FreeBSD; you can't go wrong there.
2) It's fully set up with a choice of desktop environment; traditionally KDE.
3) If your hardware supports it, it all just works right from the start.
That's really pretty much it. Learn more about the BSDs and specifically FreeBSD to find out if it is a good match for you. I recommend the following article if you already know and/or use Linux:
http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/rants/bsd4linux/01
How about Debian/kFreeBSD ? ;-)
Especially for a Debian/Linux user as myself.
Anyway, btrfs is maturing pretty well lately.
Only 2 kernel versions to go until most of the features people want will be there and mature (enough). Those 2 versions will be used to merge RAID5/6 which would be similair to RAIDZ in ZFS.
I hope bcache (general read/write block cache for Linux which implements something similair to L2ARC) will be there too.
2 kernel versions is about 3 months to a half a year (releases are between 60 to 90 days)
Edited 2012-12-25 14:58 UTC





Member since:
2008-05-03
I've always been disappointed by PC-BSD because it doesn't run natively on my hardware. It can't handle mixed controllers (SATA and PATA) and it didn't work with my ide->sata conversion switch either.
I had much better luck running it under a virtual machine (Oracle/Sun Virtualbox), where it works fine.
I have to say, though, for the desktop user, I'm not sure I see any compelling reason to run PC-BSD. Can anyone here tell me if I'm missing something? thanks.