To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Votes are just that: opinions. People need to only read into them as such and not take them too seriously. Still, I think it should be fixed by making it much more transparent and ditching the you-are-prohibited-from-voting rules, which are an anti-feature IMHO.
Can this be put to a vote? 
Votes are indeed opinions, but currently when you down vote you have to choose between 'inaccurate', 'troll' and 'off-topic'. It doesn't include 'I don't agree' or 'I don't like you'.
To keep things simple I don't think there shouldn't be any categories, because for one nobody ever sees the results. If these were dropped I wouldn't object to people down voting without giving a written motivation.
I do agree that it's rather difficult to cast any vote sometimes, because there seems to be an extensive set of rules of engagement which I have never encountered before.
There are currently several different reasons given as choices to vote someone up or down. What I'd like to see are the reasons people chose for voting my hypothetical comment up or down. Did the comment readers thin I was wrong, or was I trolling? Was I insightful, or funny? And it would be interesting to see how many voters chose + or - to come up with the final score.
Then again, maybe I don't want to know. 
I think the comment-XOR-vote system is a good thing. Either vote, or write a comment to influence voting. Most people won't say anything that hasn't already been said, so they can just choose to vote. Commenting influences votes much more than an anonymous vote, so it's a matter of balance that commenters shouldn't be able to use both comments and voting to abuse their power of influence.






Member since:
2011-05-12
Why not only allow a down vote if the voter gives a motivation?
It's not uncommon for comments that are correct and/or just someone's opinion to get down voted just because someone doesn't like an opinion.
If one can't explain why one casts a down vote one should not do it.