Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Dec 2012 10:19 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 546426
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Programming for all
by Earl C Pottinger on Thu 27th Dec 2012 19:10
in reply to "RE[2]: Programming for all"
But the same lacks that makes them fail that first year of college/university are the same problems once they consider writing a complex program no matter what the language/environment.
Code that do real work tends to be complex, and even the simpler programs still need the programmer to consider how to handle things/events when something goes wrong with inputs/hardware/communications.
RE[3]: Programming for all
by unclefester on Fri 28th Dec 2012 06:35
in reply to "RE[2]: Programming for all"
In France in the first year of university classes are *big* whereas they were 30-50 people in high school, students aren't supervised like they were before, they live alone for the first time, etc in these conditions the high failure rate has nothing to do with intelligence, more with lack of self-discipline|maturity.
A guy at my school began his Australian undergraduate medical degree at 15. Despite being in the 99.9th percentile he failed every subject in first year due to immaturity. Luckily he was allowed to re-enroll after two years.
Edited 2012-12-28 06:35 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-06
It is not purely due to poor teaching that first year university programming courses have immense failure rates.
It does seem to be beyond most people.
In France in the first year of university classes are *big* whereas they were 30-50 people in high school, students aren't supervised like they were before, they live alone for the first time, etc in these conditions the high failure rate has nothing to do with intelligence, more with lack of self-discipline|maturity.