Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Dec 2012 10:19 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 546468
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.



Member since:
2007-02-18
It probably won't. Not because of great mature open source software, anyway. Great mature open source software, at least today, seems to give great business opportunities and seems to have resulted in more people being employed to program than it is driving people out of it.
Yes. People seemed to miss my point on that. For whatever reason (possibly lack of foresight and imagination), they seem to think I'm arguing that people in the future would need to learn programming at the systems level as a basic requirement.
We've seen how the SGML based and HTML-like languages had changed the accessibility of the average user to program computers. Yes, it resulted in Geocities homepages for pets in the beginning, but that would be a ridiculous counter-argument. At the very least, you can't stop people from making what they want.
No. People haven't even used the same social networking sites for 10 years.
Yes. It only seemed like a short time ago that even knowing how to use computers was considered nerdy and uncool. Now even your average bimbo has an iPad.
Of course, we also need to remember Admiral Grace Hopper. The computer scientists at the time not only thought that compilers were impossible, they thought opening up computers to a greater audience would RUIN EVERYTHING. What they didn't anticipate was that computers and their programming models themselves changed to adapt to people.
It's funny to see the same macho types today trying to fence off programming for the "elites", not knowing they are just repeating history with their short-sightedness and pretend-OCD.
Nobody is ever "just sayin". If they were, they wouldn't need to end with it.
Just breathin