Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Dec 2012 15:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 546690
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: Comment by MOS6510
by MOS6510 on Mon 31st Dec 2012 06:01
in reply to "RE[9]: Comment by MOS6510"
Physics stay the same (mostly), but techniques improve and/or change. If the charging mechanism were to improve more energy could be transferred.
I have wondered about this before, why not make a phone with kinetic and solar charging? It won't be enough to actually charge it (unless you keep it in the sun for hours or run a marathon with it), but it would extend its operational window.
If I'm very busy at work and don't use my iPhone during the day it's almost still full when I get home. Add kinetic charging and I'm pretty sure it would be very close to 100% charge.
RE[11]: Comment by MOS6510
by zima on Mon 31st Dec 2012 13:20
in reply to "RE[10]: Comment by MOS6510"




Member since:
2005-07-06
"Yet"? ...doesn't look like it can change much, physics stays the same.
But maybe kinetic charging would be enough for a simple(-ish) e-ink device - we move our hands more than pockets (where a smartphone mostly stays)