Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 2nd Jan 2013 19:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 546921
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Isn't Java an open specification as well? There is OpenJDK at your service too. However Oracle still owns patents and copyrights over Java. And they didn't hesitate to assert them (even though they failed). C# is in similar situation - Microsoft owns a whole bunch of rights over it, even though there is an open spec and open implementation around. While one can win as Google did - not everyone has Google's resources to fight MS or other trolls off. Therefore it's pointless to invest in a technology with known legal risks. As I said - even if MS is calm now, they aren't exactly friendly in general, and you never know what kind of other trolls can get their rights tomorrow.
Edited 2013-01-02 23:56 UTC





Member since:
2005-11-29
C# is an open specification, so are large parts of .NET.
What Google did to Oracle to Java at the LEAST is highly unethical and appalling from a company that claims to do no evil. They likely would've had an easier time working with the Mono team.
Seriously, C# is everywhere, people have been saying that Microsoft will become aggressive any day now over .NET since 2001