Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 2nd Jan 2013 23:38 UTC
Microsoft Microsoft's legal chief: "We continue to be dogged by an issue we had hoped would be resolved by now: Google continues to prevent Microsoft from offering consumers a fully featured YouTube app for the Windows Phone." Utter nonsense, since MetroTube offers a complete and full YouTube experience on Windows Phone (it's one of the best Windows Phone applications), and YouTube+ on Windows 8. Two fantastically rich applications, built by small ISVs - yet Microsoft can't do the same? Don't make me laugh. Coincidentally, Microsoft is also whining some more about Google's removal of ActiveSync - Redmond again refuses to acknowledge that all it needs to do is implement the open standards CalDAV and CardDAV, just like everyone else has done. Times have changed, Ballmer. You don't get to dictate the industry anymore.
Thread beginning with comment 546992
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Not particularly...
by Nelson on Thu 3rd Jan 2013 05:29 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Not particularly..."
Nelson
Member since:
2005-11-29

I get it, Microsoft shit in your cornflakes. They did some terrible, anti-competitive things, but what happened then, is not what is happening today.

Forgiving Google today because of the sins of Microsoft in the past is nonsensical and hypocritical.

I understand full well that you think its some sort of poetic justice, understood, but that doesn't mean what Google is doing is right, or justified, nor does it make it okay for you and others to be so dismissive about their behavior.

Remember, Google's priorities just happen to somewhat align with yours today. They may not tomorrow. So be careful what actions you cheer on.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[6]: Not particularly...
by gfolkert on Thu 3rd Jan 2013 06:04 in reply to "RE[5]: Not particularly..."
gfolkert Member since:
2008-12-15

I get it, Microsoft shit in your cornflakes. They did some terrible, anti-competitive things, but what happened then, is not what is happening today.
It absolutely is still happening to this day. What with the changes to Windows Phone 7, 7.5 and 8... RT is an abortion they are slamming into peoples throats...

[g]Forgiving Google today because of the sins of Microsoft in the past is nonsensical and hypocritical. [/q]They haven't even began to be anywhere *CLOSE* to anything Microsoft did or *IS* doing.

I understand full well that you think its some sort of poetic justice, understood, but that doesn't mean what Google is doing is right, or justified, nor does it make it okay for you and others to be so dismissive about their behavior.
There is NOTHING to be dismissive about... its Microsoft going about the whole thing the wrong way and doing the public whining thing that they admonished and quashed companies and peoples for... I can say one thing:

Remember Ed Curry!

Go find out about him.

Remember, Google's priorities just happen to somewhat align with yours today. They may not tomorrow. So be careful what actions you cheer on.
If Google changes tomorrow or even in 5-10 years from now. It won't be to our detriment, except to commoditize things like Apple's Device Cash Cow or Microsoft's Application Cash Cow.

Soon, Microsoft's and Apple's Cash Cows are going to be relegated to razor thing margin, which is where they should be.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[7]: Not particularly...
by Nelson on Thu 3rd Jan 2013 06:09 in reply to "RE[6]: Not particularly..."
Nelson Member since:
2005-11-29

Okay. This has ceased to be productive.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: Not particularly...
by JAlexoid on Fri 4th Jan 2013 13:20 in reply to "RE[5]: Not particularly..."
JAlexoid Member since:
2009-05-19

Forgiving Google for what?

For allowing only mobile IE to access YouTube? But not giving the convenience they provide for leading platforms?
For making it harder to setup new* devices from a competing company?(The one that chose only to have implemented their own licensed and proprietary protocol)

Forcing Microsoft to implement free and open standards or actually help develop those open standards is in my interest as well.


Do you think that IMAP Push would have been nowhere is EAS was not as widespread? The internet was built on free and open standards, Microsoft was never a positive element on that front.(from their own internet to promoting standards that include patent licensing)

*-Existing devices will not stop working, you know.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: Not particularly...
by Nelson on Fri 4th Jan 2013 14:45 in reply to "RE[6]: Not particularly..."
Nelson Member since:
2005-11-29

Forgiving Google for what?

For allowing only mobile IE to access YouTube? But not giving the convenience they provide for leading platforms?
For making it harder to setup new* devices from a competing company?(The one that chose only to have implemented their own licensed and proprietary protocol)


It isn't just Windows Phones affected. Anyone who does not want to use the Gmail app, but wants true push, used to use EAS. Specifically on the iPhone, it was THE way to do Gmail push there.

This isn't about open standards, or how much Google likes DAV or IMAP, its about pushing people to use the Gmail App.


Forcing Microsoft to implement free and open standards or actually help develop those open standards is in my interest as well.


Microsoft and Google earn equal marks for their support. Android does not support DAV. Again, Android does not support DAV. Android does not use IMAP for Push.

The same exact situation is true for Windows Phone.


Do you think that IMAP Push would have been nowhere is EAS was not as widespread? The internet was built on free and open standards, Microsoft was never a positive element on that front.(from their own internet to promoting standards that include patent licensing)


IMAP Push is a misnomer. There is no such thing as IMAP Push.


*-Existing devices will not stop working, you know.


I am well aware.

Reply Parent Score: 2