Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 3rd Jan 2013 08:57 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547115
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: I think people are overreacting
by Morgan on Thu 3rd Jan 2013 18:12
in reply to "RE[2]: I think people are overreacting"
The cookies thing isn't actually Canonical's fault. It's due to a new internet privacy law in the EU. A lot of non-US sites I visit are now displaying some form of disclaimer to comply with the law. Details at this link:
http://www.netmagazine.com/features/beginners-guide-new-cookie-law
RE[4]: I think people are overreacting
by Lazarus on Thu 3rd Jan 2013 18:19
in reply to "RE[3]: I think people are overreacting"




Member since:
2005-08-10
Not that I didn't believe you, but I just had to check that myself. It also tops out at the price of a dromedary camel =/
Anyway, what I first noticed when I went to ubuntu.com was the following text in a great big strip across the top of my screen:
Not only does it not really make sense, but I only have my browser set to block third party cookies, so I'm getting an eye-full of non-sense over something that's likely ad related (best guess, not taking the time to look).
Ubuntu, I block third party cookies for reasons that are none of your business. By continuing to employ them, while putting up a great big nag banner complaining about it, you are agreeing to suck my balls. To learn how to suck my balls, go to Amazon.com and purchase a pornographic primer.
Yeah, that was juvenile and stupid, but it made just as much sense as the garbage on ubuntu.com.
If this is how they treat potential users, it is no surprise at all that they'll pull crap like the Amazon search lens being enabled by default.