To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
But what do they offer that Android don't? With desktops at least you had MSFT charging insane prices to the OEMs so you could undercut the competition..but Google is giving Android for free, so what EXACTLY can they offer? heck Google hasn't even forced the OEMs not to use the 2.x branch which frankly will run on just about any chip being made, so what is the appeal?
Don't get me wrong Ubuntu or Mozilla fanbois, i have NOTHING against either company, I really don't. But as a retailer i have to see a selling point in a product before even thinking about it and unless you actually give a care about "free as in freedom" which 99% of the population don't as evidenced by Apple being the richest company of the planet there just isn't a real selling point here.
With Android you have all the apps and multiple devices made by multiple companies at ALL price points, from $50 tablets up to units costing over $600 with top of the line hardware and features, with Apple you have the resale value, you have the "I'm hip and trendy" keeping up with the Joneses thing, but what does Canonical or Mozilla bring that the masses will care about? they don't have the apps, they can't undercut Android since its already free, I just don't see a selling point here.




Member since:
2010-11-04
Mozilla at least has actual hardware partners and scheduled releases in a couple countries... but they're explicitly going for the low-end market.
Canonical hasn't shown yet that they can get *any* market; they still have no takers for "Ubuntu for Android" and this project too has no hardware partners yet.
Maybe it can get momentum as an aftermarket hobbyist OS... but I still haven't actually seen any product out of their *last* mobile OS announcement, so I'm not holding my breath.
I'll probably be more generous when there's something you can flash onto an actual phone and use it.