Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Jan 2013 23:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547245
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Old versions of Android
by Laurence on Sat 5th Jan 2013 11:10
in reply to "RE[2]: Old versions of Android"
I just bought a Samsung pocket, running Gingerbread. It does what I need it to and I have neither need nor desire to upgrade it. And apparently Samsung had reasons to prefer an older version of Android for this device (size? cost? other?).
I don't see the numbers as a train wreck. It's just evolution.
I don't see the numbers as a train wreck. It's just evolution.
Gingerbread isn't 3.x, so I don't really see how that follows on from my point.
From what I gather, ICS (4.x) does have a larger disk footprint (possibly memory too?) than Gingerbread (2.3). So as much as I'd rather see ICS on all new handsets, Gingerbread might make more sense on some budget hardware.
I don't really know your handset well enough to comment specifically though




Member since:
2005-07-06
I just bought a Samsung pocket, running Gingerbread. It does what I need it to and I have neither need nor desire to upgrade it. And apparently Samsung had reasons to prefer an older version of Android for this device (size? cost? other?).
I don't see the numbers as a train wreck. It's just evolution.