Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 2nd Jan 2013 19:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547274
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I agree. XAML is however an open specification and people are free to implement it. Not that I think they should. I like QML's approach a little better. Immature does not mean bad in my opinion, just needing of some more incubation.
XAML's XML long syntax is getting long in the tooth and it seems like its just a DSL made for tooling rather than for developers to write.
I'd love a decent .NET Toolkit with QML (or a QML like) declarative UI markup language and from someone who's learned lessons from the XAML platforms.





Member since:
2011-06-26
As much I love C# (my bread and butter) and I think that it has more developer friendly features than Java and XAML blows QML out of water and yada yada, but all these good features are locked down. Only for Windows. 3rd party libraries are just that - 3rd parties.