Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 4th Jan 2013 18:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547304
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Good catch. Does this make the Android SDK any less proprietary (who cares?)
If the distinction disappears when you check out the source (which you can presumably modify however you'd like) then is it safe to call what you check out "Android"?
I think the blog post is correct in saying the Android SDK is non free (in his crazy fanatical definition of free)
Yes it is. The source code is same line for line when you check it out. It doesn't magically turn it into something new. Google reserves the right to protect their brand and trademark. Just like Mozilla reserves the right to protect the firefox brand and trademark. Mozilla's license around the Firefox brand is why Debian calls their version of the browser Iceweasel.





Member since:
2011-02-11
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/sdk/+/master