Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Jan 2013 14:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547385
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Why does HTML5 exist?
by Nelson on Sat 5th Jan 2013 16:00
in reply to "RE: Why does HTML5 exist?"
RE[2]: Why does HTML5 exist?
by lucas_maximus on Sun 6th Jan 2013 00:42
in reply to "RE: Why does HTML5 exist?"
RE[3]: Why does HTML5 exist?
by Laurence on Sun 6th Jan 2013 12:37
in reply to "RE[2]: Why does HTML5 exist?"
Well last time we spoke you thought that was kinda of okay ...
No, what I said was that it's ok to have targeted -sometimes even necessary- just so long as you're not excluding browsers.
What I'm saying here is that some sites target webkit specifically and ignore other browsers.
There's a subtle but important difference between the two. One is using each browsers features to bring about the best usability experience, and the other is not supporting browsers entirely.




Member since:
2007-03-26
Google is literally, with this, killing the promise of the mobile web. When Microsoft did it with IE6 they were rightly criticized for it.
This is not understandable. Not by any stretch of imagination. It is unbelievable, and further reinforces the notion that Google is systematically locking out competing platforms.
I'm interested in how some of you will spin this.
To be fair, they do optimise their sites to run a number of other browsers, including later versions of Internet Explorer. This is just a petty move by Google backed by an even weaker argument from Google.
That said, there is still an increasing issue of sites being developed that do specifically target webkit. And not just from Google nor Apple web developers either.