Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Jan 2013 14:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547400
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You're comparing apples to oranges. A more apt comparison would be with Microsoft's pollution of the web a while back, when lots of sites would only work with IE browsers, for example.
Google is being idiotic in this case getting down to Microsoft's old level.
Google is being idiotic in this case getting down to Microsoft's old level.
The operative part is "Microsoft's old level" MS of today is not the MS of 10-15 years ago, and they have learned(forced) to change.
I don't want to trade one group of assholes for another, altogether more far-reaching group of assholes.
Google's actions are just anti-competitive, plain and simple.
You use that word, you may not understand what it means. Blocking Google Maps impacts no-one. Nokia's maps are there to use.
Also, how is this surprising? "Don't be evil" was a result of them hating Microsoft that much.
"Google's actions are just anti-competitive, plain and simple.
You use that word, you may not understand what it means. Blocking Google Maps impacts no-one. Nokia's maps are there to use.
Also, how is this surprising? "Don't be evil" was a result of them hating Microsoft that much. "
What word? Anti-competitive? It is anti-competitive, the word has more meaning than just anti-trust law.
In this case, I use it to mean they don't want to compete, so they just lock MS out, easy as pie.





Member since:
2005-08-11
This is not the same as MS extorting fees from Android phone manufacturers, not even close. Those fees are 5-15 dollars per device, that even when passed on directly to the consumer do not hinder the consumer in any way.
Google's actions are just anti-competitive, plain and simple. They only hurt the users, not MS, who hopefully will just change the useragent string so Google can't tell the difference, and then tell Google to go pound sand