Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 2nd Jan 2013 19:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547414
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links




Member since:
2005-08-11
How is it legally binding? Was a contract signed? No? Then it is not. Like I said in my last post, such a thing has never been tested in court, while patents have.
The fact that MS will not litigate does not remove their ability to litigate, and that doubt will keep the OSS community from doing much with c# and mono, regardless of any community promise.
If MS wants the community to embrace c#, then they must really open it, not make "promises" that hold no legal weight