Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Jan 2013 14:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547420
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You're comparing apples to oranges. A more apt comparison would be with Microsoft's pollution of the web a while back, when lots of sites would only work with IE browsers, for example.
Google is being idiotic in this case getting down to Microsoft's old level.
Google is being idiotic in this case getting down to Microsoft's old level.
The operative part is "Microsoft's old level" MS of today is not the MS of 10-15 years ago, and they have learned(forced) to change.
I don't want to trade one group of assholes for another, altogether more far-reaching group of assholes.
Forced to change? Let me know when I can actually use this page on my operating system of choice:
http://www.worldwidetelescope.org/webclient/
No--Mono is an outdated joke and it does not work.
Correct, I was just pointing out that I felt your initial analogy was a bit off the mark. That's all.
It's a really stupid/dick move by google (if this was done on purpose). I assume not that many WP users were using the google maps web client anyway, nokia seems to be the bigger player in that space. But blocking those few users creates a pretty bad PR perception of google altogether.





Member since:
2009-03-17
You're comparing apples to oranges. A more apt comparison would be with Microsoft's pollution of the web a while back, when lots of sites would only work with IE browsers, for example.
Google is being idiotic in this case getting down to Microsoft's old level.