To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
A few Google services not working on the default browser of one minor platform does not equal "breaking the web." At the most, it's breaking a few web pages on that platform's default browser. At the most, it's discriminating against that particular OS/browser combination in retaliation against Microsoft's crooked (as usual) moves.
You want to see truly breaking the web? Look no further than IE5/6, from none other than Microsoft themselves. That was a disaster for everyone; not just the users of some obscure platform but pretty much all competing browsers, both Windows-native and those on alternative platforms. Netscape was destroyed by it. Even IE users suffered from Microsoft's complete neglect of the browser after they pretty much annihilated all of their competition and security issues kept building up for Microsoft's own paying customers. Web developers were left with a stifled web, unable to move on until sometime after Phoenix rose from Netscape's ashes and eventually became Firefox.
Like I said--Microsoft has done far worse for the world than this little bitch-slap aimed directly at Windows-powered phones dealt by Google. It may not be the best thing to do, but at the same Microsoft has been guilty of crooked moves on a much grander scale, many times over.
I know, I know. Sometimes it's just convenient to ignore the past and purposely forget about who or what we're really dealing with here.
Edited 2013-01-05 22:01 UTC
The IE5/6 crap is a decade old.
Google using -webkit extensions and user agent sniffing to exclude people from using their service when it works without the user agent sniffing is wrong.
JUST f--kING WRONG.
Basically you are saying because it is Google and not Microsoft it is okay.
Edited 2013-01-06 00:17 UTC





Member since:
2005-11-29
Breaking the web is relatively mild? Uh, okay. Anything to bash Microsoft, I guess.