To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
OEMs capitulating doesn't imply merit of the patents at all, it's simply a statement of how hostile the current patent law environment is that they don't want to risk a court finding against them. Whether or not a patent has merit seems to have had little bearing on the outcome of the more recent court cases.
That's bullshit. Numerous patents, in fact, have been invalidated by the courts and by the various Government agencies. There are more patent invalidations than patent injunctions.
The system is working as intended. OEMs are not defenseless, especially Samsung, who if you recall also took a royalty bearing license from Microsoft.
Samsung, who is currently in legal dispute with Apple, and has no issue disputing their patents, took a license for Microsoft patents rather easily. What does that tell you? Microsoft has a strong portfolio.





Member since:
2005-11-29
While you say extortion, others say getting their just money for their intellectual property.
If the OEMs made the determination that they would rather pay Microsoft than take things to court, then it is their choice. These are not small OEMs, and if they decided that Microsoft's patents held merit, then I'd say its good on Microsoft for providing a financially viable means by which to license such technology.
If you contrast this with others who refuse to even license such patents, then Microsoft's actions are rather benign.
There is absolutely no excuse for what Google is doing.