Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Jan 2013 14:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547459
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: The proper response...
by lucas_maximus on Sun 6th Jan 2013 00:09
in reply to "RE[2]: The proper response..."
The application in hand is a web application.
The said Web application works fine in mobile IE.
Evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Dd7RiMCrZFw
and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gG6pQviJ8XY
It got nothing to do with desktop stuff, so I don't understand why you are bringing it up.
This is about the Web pure and simple, either you want another company to dictate the web like the IE6 days or you don't.
Edited 2013-01-06 00:10 UTC




Member since:
2009-02-02
Microsoft has pissed off Google and the entire Linux and FOSS community enough don't you think? The software-patent extortion scheme they are running is way more damaging to the industry than this childish move by Google. I don't see Google ushering in an era where you can't sit down and your computer and write useful successful system software without having to pay a patent tax or have an army of lawyers. I See Microsoft doing that damage. I have news for you. If ReactOS or Wine ever gets any traction on the radar you bet Microsoft will use software patents to tax the crap out of any device that is produced with a functioning Wine or ReactOS, or even Haiku or drive them out of town on software-patent rail. What gets me is that you have smart people who know this and even complain and write blogs about this extortion yet they still go purchase devices with Microsoft OS installed.