Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Jan 2013 14:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547464
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Anti-competitive means restricting competition. Locking out WP from using a service is not restricting competition in the mapping market. They effectively took themselves out of that market(WP browser based mapping apps), they have not prevented anyone from providing a competing service.
It amazes me the excuses people will make to give Google a pass, but will condemn MS for similar actions done 10 years ago.
Apple proved that without enough data, writing a useful, safe mapping app is not easy, but hey, Google isn't being anti-competitive, they only have 98% share of mapping usage in mobile.





Member since:
2005-08-11
You use that word, you may not understand what it means. Blocking Google Maps impacts no-one. Nokia's maps are there to use.
Also, how is this surprising? "Don't be evil" was a result of them hating Microsoft that much. "
What word? Anti-competitive? It is anti-competitive, the word has more meaning than just anti-trust law.
In this case, I use it to mean they don't want to compete, so they just lock MS out, easy as pie.