Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Jan 2013 14:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547484
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: I don't know which is funnier...
by tylerdurden on Sun 6th Jan 2013 01:00
in reply to "RE: I don't know which is funnier..."
RE[3]: I don't know which is funnier...
by Nelson on Sun 6th Jan 2013 01:39
in reply to "RE[2]: I don't know which is funnier..."
Exactly right. These are, in the end, all greedy corporations. There is no morality, there is only convenience. Google is kind (or semi-kind, and tolerable) to the open source community because it is convenient for them, not because of some moral high ground they take.
As soon as it becomes unattractive to them, they show their teeth and act as any other corporation would.
RE[3]: I don't know which is funnier...
by ze_jerkface on Sun 6th Jan 2013 06:22
in reply to "RE[2]: I don't know which is funnier..."
once a business reaches a specific volume they seem to display similar predatory tendencies.
It's when the company is no longer ran by a founder that values the business along with the customers and is instead ran by a board of directors that wants a profit and nothing more. All the large publicly traded corporations today would prostitute 10 year old girls if it made them a decent profit and didn't malign their public image. Just look at how the Google CEO talked about how evading taxes is actually a good thing. No loyalty at all to the country that helped foster its growth, it's just a geographic area of resources to them. Morality only matters to them in terms of legality and public perception.





Member since:
2005-10-12
Some of us who are up in arms about it are not Microsoft fanboys. Crap like this is wrong, regardless of who's doing it.