Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Jan 2013 14:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547491
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Glad I would never get a Windows phone.
by lucas_maximus on Sun 6th Jan 2013 01:34
in reply to "RE[5]: Glad I would never get a Windows phone."
So you're saying that it effectively never happened? Time has moved on and the entire Web as it stands today would not be any further at the present time in a parallel universe in which Microsoft had not done it? Sorry, but I'm just not seeing it. Microsoft has set the web back YEARS, and it really hasn't been all that many years ago that some serious progress has been made after it finally got back on track. Microsoft never gave the Web all those wasted years back; it had to go through a painfully slow process of correcting itself.
I am not saying that, actually earlier version of IE actually advanced it better than netscape ...
Anyway, Google a WEB company playing tit for tat and using browser sniffing agents to make a WEB App not work deliberately is just as bad as what you were complaining about.
No, if you'd read I'm only saying: You get treated by others in the same (or similar) ways that you treat them. And this really is just a little slap in the face compared to what Microsoft has done. I even said "it may not be the best thing to do."
Oh so you are advocating tit for tat technological enhancement ... as I said anything but Microsoft.
It would be better if everyone worked together and grew up.
Sorry I am better than that, and you are supposed to be also.
Edited 2013-01-06 01:35 UTC
RE[7]: Glad I would never get a Windows phone.
by UltraZelda64 on Sun 6th Jan 2013 02:23
in reply to "RE[6]: Glad I would never get a Windows phone."
Oh so you are advocating tit for tat technological enhancement ... as I said anything but Microsoft.
No, it's a natural instinct. It doesn't need to be advocated, it's natural and it already happens. Take the computers, technology, corporations, money, etc. away and replace humans with any other animal (or even a combination of different species) and you'll get the exact same results. That's just reality... what part of it is so hard to understand? I already pointed this out in my original post.
RE[6]: Glad I would never get a Windows phone.
by WereCatf on Sun 6th Jan 2013 06:17
in reply to "RE[5]: Glad I would never get a Windows phone."
No, if you'd read I'm only saying: You get treated by others in the same (or similar) ways that you treat them. And this really is just a little slap in the face compared to what Microsoft has done. I even said "it may not be the best thing to do."
So, do tell me, what did all the end-users do to Google in order to deserve being locked out?
I find it ironic that according to Google's explanation, the whole thing was because the browser produced an inferior experience. Which, by Microsoft web browser standards, sounds highly plausible to me.
And another silly jab at Microsoft. If you'd cared to pay any attention you would've noticed already that IE10 is actually pretty standards-compliant and offers a perfectly useable experience.
RE[7]: Glad I would never get a Windows phone.
by UltraZelda64 on Sun 6th Jan 2013 15:31
in reply to "RE[6]: Glad I would never get a Windows phone."
So, do tell me, what did all the end-users do to Google in order to deserve being locked out?
Well, according to Google's own words, they were saved the hassle of a buggy experience with their services.
And another silly jab at Microsoft. If you'd cared to pay any attention you would've noticed already that IE10 is actually pretty standards-compliant and offers a perfectly useable experience.
Yes. Because bugs don't happen. IE10 is perfect.





Member since:
2006-12-05
So you're saying that it effectively never happened? Time has moved on and the entire Web as it stands today would not be any further at the present time in a parallel universe in which Microsoft had not done it? Sorry, but I'm just not seeing it. Microsoft has set the web back YEARS, and it really hasn't been all that many years ago that some serious progress has been made after it finally got back on track. Microsoft never gave the Web all those wasted years back; it had to go through a painfully slow process of correcting itself.
No, if you'd read I'm only saying: You get treated by others in the same (or similar) ways that you treat them. And this really is just a little slap in the face compared to what Microsoft has done. I even said "it may not be the best thing to do."
Anyway, there is an update that Google is apparently reverting this behavior to please all five Internet Explorer on Windows Phone users. I find it ironic that according to Google's explanation, the whole thing was because the browser produced an inferior experience. Which, by Microsoft web browser standards, sounds highly plausible to me.
Edited 2013-01-06 01:06 UTC