Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Jan 2013 14:53 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y And so this situation is starting to get ridiculous - and consumers are, as usual, caught in the middle of it all. Google has just blocked Windows Phone devices from accessing Google Maps on their phones. In addition, it also seems Windows Phone users are now restricted to the basic HTML version of the mobile GMail website. While understandable from a defensive perspective - Microsoft's extortion scheme targeting Android device makers and all that - it's still a massive dick move that only hurts consumers. Update: the media attention has worked - Google is backpedalling, and will remove the redirect. "We periodically test Google Maps compatibility with mobile browsers to make sure we deliver the best experience for those users. In our last test, IE mobile still did not offer a good maps experience with no ability to pan or zoom and perform basic map functionality. As a result, we chose to continue to redirect IE mobile users to Google.com where they could at least make local searches. The Firefox mobile browser did offer a somewhat better user experience and that’s why there is no redirect for those users. Recent improvements to IE mobile and Google Maps now deliver a better experience and we are currently working to remove the redirect. We will continue to test Google Maps compatibility with other mobile browsers to ensure the best possible experience for users."
Thread beginning with comment 547528
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
WereCatf
Member since:
2006-02-15

No, if you'd read I'm only saying: You get treated by others in the same (or similar) ways that you treat them. And this really is just a little slap in the face compared to what Microsoft has done. I even said "it may not be the best thing to do."


So, do tell me, what did all the end-users do to Google in order to deserve being locked out?

I find it ironic that according to Google's explanation, the whole thing was because the browser produced an inferior experience. Which, by Microsoft web browser standards, sounds highly plausible to me.


And another silly jab at Microsoft. If you'd cared to pay any attention you would've noticed already that IE10 is actually pretty standards-compliant and offers a perfectly useable experience.

Reply Parent Score: 4

UltraZelda64 Member since:
2006-12-05

So, do tell me, what did all the end-users do to Google in order to deserve being locked out?

Well, according to Google's own words, they were saved the hassle of a buggy experience with their services.

And another silly jab at Microsoft. If you'd cared to pay any attention you would've noticed already that IE10 is actually pretty standards-compliant and offers a perfectly useable experience.

Yes. Because bugs don't happen. IE10 is perfect.

Reply Parent Score: 2

WereCatf Member since:
2006-02-15

"So, do tell me, what did all the end-users do to Google in order to deserve being locked out?

Well, according to Google's own words, they were saved the hassle of a buggy experience with their services.
"

"We know better than you so we're just going to go ahead and decide things for you!" -- quite a few dictators.

And another silly jab at Microsoft. If you'd cared to pay any attention you would've noticed already that IE10 is actually pretty standards-compliant and offers a perfectly useable experience.

Yes. Because bugs don't happen. IE10 is perfect. [/q]

Wow, someone is really hanging on to a tangent.

Reply Parent Score: 2

lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

Nobody is saying IE10 is perfect. IE10 is a pretty decent browser.

Reply Parent Score: 2