Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Jan 2013 14:53 UTC

Thread beginning with comment 547563
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Proves me right.
by Windows Sucks on Sun 6th Jan 2013 14:24
in reply to "RE[3]: Proves me right. "
Google is a business and need to support their existing customers, so they keep it in their paid products. Not having it for free will create an incentive to create better solutions.
Right so you would think they would want to move their customers to a better solution if there was one.
So they are saying that DAV is not good enough for their business customers. If it was they could transition them off active sync since they have consultants working with most of their business customers.
Fact is Active sync is the best solution if you want blackberry like sync connected to Google Apps in the enterprise.
That open standards talk is BS.
RE[5]: Proves me right.
by JAlexoid on Mon 7th Jan 2013 14:15
in reply to "RE[4]: Proves me right. "
If only these devices had support for the open standards that Google provides...
Customer is always right, so when their customers(like myslef) say that they need EAS...(you know the rest)
PS: EAS is not necessarily the best, it's the best and widespread protocol.
Edited 2013-01-07 14:17 UTC
Member since:
2005-07-06
But if Google cared about open standards they would of took it out of all their products but they didn't. They kept it in their paid products.
"
Google is a business and need to support their existing customers, so they keep it in their paid products. Not having it for free will create an incentive to create better solutions.