To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Schmidt and Ballmer are not founding members and they both answer to shareholders.
But it's obviously a generalization, you can find small businesses that are ran by total assholes.
In general though I would trust the moral decisions of a small business owner over a CEO that answers to shareholders.
I once ran into a compatibility problem with some small business software and the owner contacted me personally and even worked on a solution before I read his email.
To Microsoft, Apple and Google I'm not even worth considering unless it involves thousands of dollars or their public image. Even when they do care it's only out of obligation. None of those companies take pride in developing relationships with partners. Microsoft only contacted us once in the last few years to make sure we were going to follow through with a big purchase and not go open source. They never even followed up with a thank you for sending them thousands of dollars. Not going open source? That's all we need to know. Goodbye.
yeah, but I was simply pointing out that in this case, since the thread involved google and miscrosoft, your appeal to emotion was based on a bit of an iffy premise; Ballmer is a founding member of microsoft for all intents and purposes. And Schmidt is no longer the CEO of google, Larry Page is.





Member since:
2009-03-17
Are you sure? Currently, both Google and Microsoft are run by founding members of their respective organizations.