Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Jan 2013 14:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547600
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Google also went against their own promise to drop H.264 support from Chrome. (They never promised to drop Flash though). Not keeping their own words is worse. However dropping H.264 from the browser wouldn't be enough to promote open codec. They had to ditch it from YouTube to make a real push. But probably because of slow adoption of accelerated VP8 hardware decoding, they decided not to. I hope they'll do it when more chip makers will support VP8 out of the box.
Edited 2013-01-06 22:52 UTC
RE[5]: Comment by shmerl
by JAlexoid on Mon 7th Jan 2013 14:32
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by shmerl"




Member since:
2012-06-22
No I'm not being silly.
You can't love open source and needlessly promote Flash. It's like saying your are pro-vegan while needlessly adding meat to your restaurant's salads.
It's too contradictory to take seriously.
I'm not an open source lover and I would have ran Flash into the ground if I owned YouTube. All they had to do was require an alternative codec or plug-in to view YouTube videos when it was the only site of its kind. What did Google do? Bundle Flash with Chrome and leave it on by default.
What's silly is that so many people actually buy into the bullshit that these megacorps come up with. Actually it's just sad.
Edited 2013-01-06 21:02 UTC