Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Jan 2013 14:53 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y And so this situation is starting to get ridiculous - and consumers are, as usual, caught in the middle of it all. Google has just blocked Windows Phone devices from accessing Google Maps on their phones. In addition, it also seems Windows Phone users are now restricted to the basic HTML version of the mobile GMail website. While understandable from a defensive perspective - Microsoft's extortion scheme targeting Android device makers and all that - it's still a massive dick move that only hurts consumers. Update: the media attention has worked - Google is backpedalling, and will remove the redirect. "We periodically test Google Maps compatibility with mobile browsers to make sure we deliver the best experience for those users. In our last test, IE mobile still did not offer a good maps experience with no ability to pan or zoom and perform basic map functionality. As a result, we chose to continue to redirect IE mobile users to Google.com where they could at least make local searches. The Firefox mobile browser did offer a somewhat better user experience and that’s why there is no redirect for those users. Recent improvements to IE mobile and Google Maps now deliver a better experience and we are currently working to remove the redirect. We will continue to test Google Maps compatibility with other mobile browsers to ensure the best possible experience for users."
Thread beginning with comment 547814
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: it's about time
by smashIt on Tue 8th Jan 2013 18:23 UTC in reply to "RE: it's about time"
smashIt
Member since:
2005-07-06

The very browser family/rendering engine in question would be much lower in importance in the world if it hadn't gained its position illegally in the first place, through the leveraging of another monopoly--but apparently the past no longer matters in the slightest bit.


you can repeat it as often as you want, but ms didn't need any illegal tactics against netscape
netscape just killed itselfe after 3.x

a quote from wikipedia:
The aging Netscape Communicator 4.x was slower than Internet Explorer 5.0. Typical web pages had become heavily illustrated, often JavaScript-intensive, and encoded with HTML features designed for specific purposes but now employed as global layout tools (HTML tables, the most obvious example of this, were especially difficult for Communicator to render). The Netscape browser, once a solid product, became crash-prone and buggy; for example, some versions re-downloaded an entire web page to re-render it when the browser window was re-sized (a nuisance to dial-up users), and the browser would usually crash when the page contained simple Cascading Style Sheets. Moreover, Netscape Communicator's browser interface design appeared dated in comparison to Internet Explorer and interface changes in Microsoft and Apple's operating systems.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: it's about time
by UltraZelda64 on Tue 8th Jan 2013 18:43 in reply to "RE[2]: it's about time"
UltraZelda64 Member since:
2006-12-05

Nice way to spin it. If that were the case, if products truly won market share based on their actual merits alone, then Windows itself would not have gained its monopoly in the way it did. And Microsoft would have never needed to use illegal tactics with its monopoly power to crush all competition before it even has time to exist as a threat on the market through strong-arming OEMs (BeOS?). Opera never went anywhere--if Microsoft didn't have the entire world by the balls with their Windows/Office/IE tri-monopoly, people would have been able to switch to it with no problem.

Hell, if a product had to be technically superior to win, Windows' own predecessor--MS-DOS--would not even have been the dominant operating system. Instead, that entire class of operating systems would be seen as the complete piece of shit that it is. Of course, Microsoft's lucky timing and deal with IBM, combined with hardware limitations of the original IBM PC, sealed history--and Microsoft's cheap tactics solidified them as a monopoly in many areas for decades to come.

It's about damn time for their eventual collapse, or at least significant reduction in power. It's what the world needed at least a decade ago.

Edited 2013-01-08 18:56 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: it's about time
by Windows8_Hater on Tue 8th Jan 2013 19:29 in reply to "RE[3]: it's about time"
Windows8_Hater Member since:
2013-01-08

You darn freetards are incredible. I am pretty pissed at Microsoft right now for their stupid W8 bullcrap, and your retarded GatesSatan talk still was able to persuade me to write this post.

Just when I thought there is nothing worse then the damn W8 loving Metrotards.. Poof, I am again proven wrong. You freetards are Microsoft's biggest ally, seriously.

Anyway, YES, Internet Explorer 4 was better than Netscape 4, by a wide margin. Before you wanna shitstorm me now, read this:

http://penguinday.wordpress.com/2010/11/01/the-ancient-past/

Edited 2013-01-08 19:49 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1