Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Jan 2013 14:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547826
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: it's about time
by Windows8_Hater on Tue 8th Jan 2013 20:11
in reply to "RE[5]: it's about time"
Oh you damn idiot, I am literally lost for words now. That quote is from Eric Hoffer's classical work "The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements"
http://www.amazon.com/The-True-Believer-Movements-Perennial/dp/0060...
And you COMPLETELY missed what that quote means. Hint: Christians usually don't refer to their deity as "a god".
Anyway, congratulations for completely missing the mark. I wonder if your other opinions base on similar mind acrobatics.
RE[7]: it's about time
by UltraZelda64 on Tue 8th Jan 2013 20:29
in reply to "RE[6]: it's about time"
Oh you damn idiot, I am literally lost for words now. That quote is from Eric Hoffer's classical work "The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements"
Never read it, or heard about it. So sue me. After you get done with all the name calling.
And you COMPLETELY missed what that quote means. Hint: Christians usually don't refer to their deity as "a god".
Yes, I know that--but in reality, it's just as imaginary as every other god mankind has made up for the various religions out there. There is exactly one, more than one, or absolutely no god(s) in existence depending on who you ask--obviously the closely-related religious groups in question only wants you to believe in "theirs," because otherwise you're going straight to the fiery depths of hell that they made up just for you. I am not looking at this from a Christian point of view; did you seriously expect me to? Some people believe in multiple gods... but not the Christian one. I believe in none, yet I realize that "theirs" is not the only one any one has ever made up, nor is it the first. I already said I don't believe in a god or devil, therefore that quote is meaningless to me.
Anyway, congratulations for completely missing the mark. I wonder if your other opinions base on similar mind acrobatics.
Congratulations to you, too, for completely failing to make a point by hiding it in nothing but flames and nonsense.
Edited 2013-01-08 20:39 UTC





Member since:
2006-12-05
"A movement can exist without a god but never without a devil"
As a satanist who does not believe in the generically-named imaginary god that Christians claim to worship and who does not view "Satan" as the evil deity that they do, do I really give a damn to read an article with such a subtitle? Further, its (and your) use of the word "freetard" (and "Metrotards") doesn't exactly lead me to believe that anything insightful and of real maturity can be gained from it, either.
Wake me up when those two "words" make it into a real dictionary, and then maybe I'll take it seriously. It's funny that I didn't even mention any "free software" operating systems or applications (only commercial) and you're still just tossing that "freetard" word (if you can call it that) around. And I don't even know or care what a "GatesSatan talk" is, so I'll just not bother with that one and assume that it also will never make it into a dictionary.
Sorry, I don't talk fairy tales, cults and superstitious mumbo-jumbo. Drop the religious nonsense and false words and try again.
Edited 2013-01-08 20:10 UTC