Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th Jan 2013 23:27 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547847
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Anandtech has been really busy trying to messure and compare:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6422/samsung-chromebook-xe303-review-...
The latest ARM-chip beats the previous Intel Atom chip.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6529/busting-the-x86-power-myth-indep...
The latest Intel-chip beats the older NVIDIA Tegra 3.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6536/arm-vs-x86-the-real-showdown/14
It is starting to look like a proper race now.





Member since:
2011-08-19
"Microsoft's somewhat official reason is that it can't create an emulation layer fast enough to run code compiled for x86, and they are probably right."
I wouldn't say they are probably right, ARM has done great job keep power usage down, but with that they sacrifice performance. You take even quad core ARM based cpu right now, it would be much slower then x86 based. A recent interview with rep from ARM maker, they he said "Intel can't match us in power consumption" but stopped short of fact they can't match Intel in performance. Although only thing that happened from that was 2 months later Intel put out an new Atom cpu that was in power range of most ARM parts, and has little better performance.