Linked by the_randymon on Wed 9th Jan 2013 00:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547932
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: What an utter non-sense
by toast88 on Wed 9th Jan 2013 13:35
in reply to "RE: What an utter non-sense"
That was his point..
It doesn't matter. X11 is going to be abandoned in the future. It's 25-year-old, crufty old code no one really understands in full anymore.
It will be superceded by Wayland + XWayland. There is no fragmentation simply because in the future, Linux will be Wayland-only like MacOS is Quartz-only.
Ubuntu is going to enable Wayland for 13.04.
Adrian
RE[3]: What an utter non-sense
by dsmogor on Wed 9th Jan 2013 14:27
in reply to "RE[2]: What an utter non-sense"
Wayland is fundamentally a protocol with a ref impl., and he wanted to avoid replicating current mess with X11 window managers with equivalent mess of competing wayland implementations, that in the end some poor souls have to maintain and debug inside of Linux companies that loose money on that.





Member since:
2011-02-11
Did you read the article?
Someone who makes this comparison in this context has absolutely zero idea why Wayland was written in the first place and how it differentiates from X11.
Wayland is a complete NEW design, porting Compiz to X11 would not only mean a lot work but it's also completely pointless. "
That was his point..