Linked by the_randymon on Wed 9th Jan 2013 00:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 547954
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: What an utter non-sense
by Gullible Jones on Wed 9th Jan 2013 20:28
in reply to "RE[3]: What an utter non-sense"
RE[5]: What an utter non-sense
by dsmogor on Thu 10th Jan 2013 09:39
in reply to "RE[4]: What an utter non-sense"
It's about 2 things:
- wasted effort (as author notes WM is much much more complex to get right than it appears)
- bugs, inconsistencies, and variances in implementations that cause headaches to application developers.
What the author suggests is not forcing simple functionality set upon everybody throat but simply promote the common (hard) part to a common system library / service that could then be extended implementing different policies people need.
Wayland, being the new, virgin ground is the best opportunity for that.




Member since:
2005-09-01
Wayland is fundamentally a protocol with a ref impl., and he wanted to avoid replicating current mess with X11 window managers with equivalent mess of competing wayland implementations, that in the end some poor souls have to maintain and debug inside of Linux companies that loose money on that.