Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th Jan 2013 23:27 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 548016
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It goes both ways, you want to limit the scope to mobile devices where metro's touch UI is much stronger, but it's totally fair to criticise it on the desktop. It's not merit-less criticism either, there are very good points, you just have a difference of opinion, which is fine.
I think a crucial difference is that mobile devices are in the majority and are trending upwards while Desktop devices are not.
This is a reality that a lot of people on this website will need to come to grips with. Times have changed. If you don't want to upgrade to Windows 8, fine. But the reality is that a lot of people will.
Too many people conflate "Windows 8 isn't exactly what I want" to "Windows 8 will undoubtedly fail".
Windows isn't engineered around the specific need of one person, or even a sizable number of people. It is engineered in a manner to cater to both where the industry is and where the industry is going.
If Microsoft had just released Windows 7+ with minimal improvements, it would've been a disaster. Microsoft needed direction. Windows 8 gives them direction.
Nelson,
"I think a crucial difference is that mobile devices are in the majority and are trending upwards while Desktop devices are not."
You are correct to observe that the tablet market is growing while the desktop market is not, that's expected since the desktop market is already mature. Never the less, criticism of metro on the desktop still holds.
"If Microsoft had just released Windows 7+ with minimal improvements, it would've been a disaster."
These are strange times...when giving people what they would have wanted is considered a disaster.





Member since:
2011-01-28
Nelson,
"Its easy to single out a minority demographic and craft a criticism. You can criticize any operating system for not meeting the needs of a configuration if you limit the scope enough."
It goes both ways, you want to limit the scope to mobile devices where metro's touch UI is much stronger, but it's totally fair to criticise it on the desktop. It's not merit-less criticism either, there are very good points, you just have a difference of opinion, which is fine.