Linked by MOS6510 on Thu 10th Jan 2013 23:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 548291
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
IMO, C++ is such a syntactical kludge that plenty of programmers I have worked with revert to procedural thinking inadvertently when coding in it.
Despite my C++ apologetics, I have to agree with the part about reverting to procedural thinking. However, this kind of thing is implied in Bjarne Stroustrup's book.
Some things are just not suited to an OO style. I find OO best suited for defining ADTs. Frameworks should be a mixture of procedures and ADTs, not large object systems.




Member since:
2009-03-17
In my experience it is the opposite; C++ deters people from proper object orientation. IMO, C++ is such a syntactical kludge that plenty of programmers I have worked with revert to procedural thinking inadvertently when coding in it.
I don't think the object orientation is what makes large C++ projects hard to maintain.